SOURCING STRATEGIES
THE PRICE OF CHANGE

Credible data and only moderate hotel rate increases have put a new spin on negotiations for 2024

By Amon Cohen (First published in August 2023 and updated October 2023)

As travel buyers made the traditional late-summer start to their annual hotel negotiations (a process still undertaken by 84 per cent of travel managers, according to a May 2023 survey by HRS), there were signs that 2024 will prove less painful than its predecessor: unsolicited rate offers from suppliers.

The average increase in negotiated rates logged by CWT for 2023 programmes was 7-8 per cent, “which wasn’t quite as bad as some suppliers forecasted but still a pretty hefty increase,” says Andrew Herman, senior manager for hotel consulting at the travel management company’s Solutions Group consultancy wing. “We are expecting an increase in negotiated rates for 2024 but not quite as high as last year.”

He continues: “We anticipate a little more balance between suppliers and buyers. We have noticed a big increase in unsolicited bids from suppliers, which to us means there is an appetite to add corporate customers. A lot of hotels’ business since the pandemic has been from leisure customers. We do still expect leisure demand to be quite high but that is going to level off a bit.

“Some hotels have even come back and lowered their corporate negotiated rate during the year. With the increase in unsolicited bids, there’s an opportunity to have more challengers invited into a hotel programme, which will help with those cost increases as well,” Herman adds.

Other hotel rate experts share Herman’s optimism. “I don’t think rate rises are going to be as bad as for 2023,” says Peter Grover, managing director, Europe, for price assurance and audit specialist Tripbam. “Last year, some hotels refused to speak to travel managers because they didn’t need them. That might prove short-termist if leisure volumes dip as people feel the pinch economically.”

Similarly, booked rates through self-styled “lodging-as-a-service platform” HRS are up by double digits in 2023, but for 2024 “we are expecting single-digit increases, maybe 5-7 per cent,” says the company's procurement consulting director, Alexander Dyskin.

REGIONAL VARIATION

As always, the headline trends mask numerous geographical variations. “North America still has strong leisure demand, which means rates are staying high,” says Grover. “Across EMEA we are seeing some softening of that as inflation hits the cost of living.”

HRS has observed rates remaining depressed in China and other Asia-Pacific destinations where demand has not recovered post-Covid. More generally, Dyskin expects rates to rise faster in large cities which attract both business and leisure visitors. In Germany, for example, HRS tips rates to rise 7-9 per cent “but in cities like Berlin and Munich we could expect even double-digit numbers,” says Dyskin.

Every city has its own supply and demand story to tell, which is why, say both Herman and Dyskin, buyers need to understand those factors and develop bespoke negotiating tactics for every destination where they have substantial volume.

On the supply side, the pipeline of new properties remains slow after Covid, but there are exceptions, with Grover noting both the Middle East and India. In the case of the latter, that is just as well because Tripbam has seen demand treble, sending rates rocketing.

However, in other regions, mainly in secondary or even tertiary cities, supply is constrained by an additional factor: a continuing lack of hotel staff, which means some rooms remain mothballed, says Dyskin.

CHANGING HABITS 

Paradoxically, it is often those same secondary markets where corporate demand has recovered faster. Financial and professional services companies, which tend to frequent gateway cities, are making up to 50 per cent fewer bookings than pre-Covid. For example, says Grover, “London is 50 per cent down on business transient demand,” although he added that “the hotels are still full with people on their holidays”.

On the other hand, according to Dyskin, construction, manufacturing and automotive companies are travelling as much as ever, fuelling strong demand in decidedly non-touristy cities, such as Stuttgart in the case of Germany.

Buyers therefore need to reassess not only the supply and demand narrative for key cities, but also within their own companies – narratives which in some cases were transformed dramatically by Covid. “If people haven’t come back to your head office in Canary Wharf [London’s financial district], for instance, you don’t need many contracted rates any more but you might still need them in Barcelona because everyone is flying there for their team meetings,” says Grover. “It’s a case of keeping nimble.”

Another consideration is a change in trip duration. Hybrid working and the trend for fewer-but-longer trips will boost demand among travellers for extended-stay hotels, which could impact how buyers curate their programmes, says Amex GBT Consulting’s global hotel lead, Anu Kuchibhotla.

“We’d advise corporate buyers to look at the average length of stay across their programme to make sure they have the right properties in their portfolio. We can already see some global hotel chains respond to this trend, with Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt, and Wyndham all having expanded their extended-stay offerings,” says Kuchibhotla.

Fortunately, for the first time in four years, buyers have substantial recent booking data behind them to understand their travel patterns. Suppliers will also be looking for those improved insights, and improved bookings to go alongside them. “Hotels are saying this year that they want volume commitment,” says Dyskin. “But this year we also have much better data and therefore we can select a set of more strategic partners. The data is more credible.”

The inevitable consequence of better visibility for both sides is that corporate clients need to return to the first principles of procurement and consolidate with a small number of preferred hotels. “We’re seeing a shift towards reducing suppliers: really having a solid partnership to limit those rate increases and drive savings,” says Herman. “But it’s super-important to have a look as well at challenger properties and plan to shift share if that’s going to make more sense.”

Kuchibhotla agrees, pointing to “a growing resolve among buyers to challenge prices increases” following the high rates that corporates have accepted over the past couple of years. “As part of this, focusing on negotiations with a handful of preferred suppliers will be a key tactic for corporates to secure the best deal.”

RATE CONSIDERATIONS

Buyers also have to consider what kind of rate they negotiate with hotels. Herman, Grover, Dyskin and Kuchibhotla all see hotels pushing dynamic rates – an agreed level of discount on the best available rate. For cities where clients have significant spend, however, the four are unanimous in advising buyers to avoid being steered down the dynamic pricing route. Instead, buyers should insist on negotiated fixed rates, which almost always prove cheaper in a rising market.

“Hotels continue to push dynamic pricing, whereas the general preference from corporates is for static rates, especially in key locations and properties. Where corporates may have accepted dynamic pricing for 2023 rates, the appetite for such a strategy has reduced for 2024 rates,” says Kuchibhotla.

Another practice that’s gaining prevalence among hotels, notes Kuchibhotla, is a switch from LRA [Last Room Availability] to NLRA [Non-Last Room Availability] rates, a key negotiation item during the RFP process.

Herman counsels buyers holding out for guaranteed last room availability on negotiated rates. “In initial bids we have seen come back for 2024, hotels are continuing to demonstrate a strong preference for dynamic and non-LRA rates, especially as occupancy continues to grow,” he says.

“That gives hotels the most ability to block out rates as occupancy picks up, but we are recommending to our clients that they really negotiate hard to secure LRA rates at their top properties and in their top markets. That’s going to give them the most protection against any rate increases.”

Fixed rates, Dyskin notes, also allow companies to budget and allocate anticipated accommodation costs, an increasingly important requirement now companies are spending more heavily on travel post-Covid.

For cities where spend does not merit a fixed negotiated rate, the experts agree dynamic rates do remain worthwhile. “Make sure you have as many of your bookings covered by some sort of deal as possible,” says Grover. “More than 85 per cent of all the hotel bookings you make ought to be covered by some kind of discount. If not, you need to look to plug those gaps.”

However, he does offer a warning about using dynamic rates. “You can only do it if you have an auditing process in place because otherwise you have no way of tracking it,” he says. “Sometimes you might instead get 15 per cent off a ghost rate that isn’t the best available rate but another rate that’s been put in above it.”

Herman and Dyskin also encourage attempting to leverage better rates by offering the same suppliers not only transient room night business but meetings and events spend plus long-stay business and even office space rental.

And Herman has one final, timely piece of advice for the 2024 RFP season. “Launch early,” he says. “A lot of RFPs were launched in October or November last year. Consultants advised clients to do that because they weren’t sure what was going to happen to the economy, but this year they should launch by mid-September in order to get everything wrapped up and ready to roll for the beginning of 2024.”

(Flash poll conducted in August; responses = 81)

(Flash poll conducted in August; responses = 81)

ALL TOGETHER NOW
Integrating travel and meetings spend in hotel negotiations

This summer both CWT and HRS published hotel negotiation planning reports that included the recommendation that buyers should integrate their spend.

CWT urged companies to offer hotels not only their regular transient business travel spend but as much of their meetings and events business as they can muster too. This is especially important now because many of those companies are booking fewer room nights than they did pre-pandemic. “As travel buyers find themselves with less volume to offer for negotiating power they are repeatedly seeking to weave in M&E volume as compensation,” said CWT.

HRS went even further in suggesting additional types of spend to throw into the negotiating pot, including long-stay bookings, day use of hotels and “bleisure” – employees tacking nights on to their business trip for leisure purposes. According to HRS, “Converging all lodging spend can deliver savings of up to 16 per cent on bundled programmes.”

Speaking at ITM’s autumn conference about supplier partnerships, one buyer went even further and argued their travellers’ leisure spend should be considered too.

Jan Jacobsen, travel and mobility procurement director at Accenture said: “It could be any supplier, not just airlines, but they have to look at this holistically – the value proposition of what we bring to the table and that’s 740,000 employees worldwide. They also travel for leisure.”

He continued: “I’m giving you access to a tribe of 740,000 people. That becomes your tribe too. Why doesn’t that have value? That should come into the equation too.”

The logic of integrating transient and meetings spend sounds compelling, and has been advocated for many years, but does it work? Not necessarily, according to independent consultant Kevin Iwamoto, whose career has included spells as a travel manager and as a strategic meetings management professional. “In theory, any time you can combine volume you can negotiate something better. In practice it’s far more challenging.”

Another sceptic is Meenaz Diamond, senior vice president for M&E, airlines and marketing at the Accor hotel group. Asked how she responds to corporate clients suggesting a combined transient and meetings negotiation, she says: “Show me the data and show me the predictability. Let’s have a conversation and look at it. I wouldn’t say no straight away but my instinct would be to say no because I know all of the issues that are involved in meetings and events compared to business travel.”

Diamond has several reasons for believing travel and meetings need to be handled separately. First, there is the question of data. Corporate clients tend to have good visibility of their transient spend; of their meetings spend rather less so.

Then there is the difficulty of setting an appropriate blanket discount in advance for meetings in the same way as for transient. That does not work well for either the buyer or the seller, Diamond believes. For the buyer, each meeting is different, thereby requiring a longer conversation.

“Anything beyond a repetitive 10 to 15-person training kind of meeting has additional bells and whistles attached to it,” she says. “They might be small bells and whistles but they are there.”

Iwamoto also identifies lack of comprehensive data on meetings spend as a culprit, a challenge linked to travel typically having one owner within an organisation but meetings having several. A survey by HRS found that only 25 per cent of travel managers say their team has ownership of meetings management.

An integrated negotiation only has a chance of succeeding, in Iwamoto’s view, if those responsible for the two categories work together. Can vendors smell disunity? “I pity the buyer who doesn’t realise how astute suppliers are,” Iwamoto says. “The suppliers will recognise that right away.”