The Spanish government has proposed a ban on some short-haul domestic flights where there is an alternative train journey of less than two and a half hours.
The move is part of the Spanish government’s 2050 climate action plan to reduce carbon emissions and follows a similar ban implemented in France last year, which currently applies to three routes from Paris Orly airport to Nantes, Lyon and Bordeaux.
Connecting flights in Spain with links to international routes will not be affected by the proposed ban, so international air hubs such as Madrid and Barcelona are unlikely to see any schedule or slot changes.
The proposal, which also considers the impact of restricting private jet use, will undergo further review before it is enacted into law and, according to industry reports, details remain unclear as to when the measures will be introduced or which domestic connections will be affected.
Given Spain’s extensive high-speed rail network (the second largest in the world after China), Marcel Forns, general manager of Spanish business travel association GEBTA, believes such a ban would be well received.
“The market is already working in favour of the train where total trip duration is similar [and] where it shows to be competitive and comfortable for travellers,” he said.
However, he insists “an indiscriminate ban doesn’t make sense” and that, as is the case in France, some domestic feeder airports should be exempt.
A recent Hitachi Rail survey into attitudes towards public transport in 12 global markets (including six in Europe: London, Berlin, Milan, Warsaw, Paris and Copenhagen) found a least two-thirds of respondents would make the switch from planes to trains if faster and cheaper options were offered.
Moreover, the majority, 64 per cent, were also in favour of banning short-haul flights between cities where a high-speed rail link is available. Among survey respondents in Paris and Milan this figure increased to 75 per cent and 69 per cent respectively.
However, views were split over the idea of increasing air taxes to fund improved rail travel. While around half (56 per cent) were in favour, one in three survey respondents opposed the idea.
Climate advocates and travel industry professionals have also criticised the limited impact of short-haul flight bans in instances where airport slots have been reallocated to longer, more carbon-intensive flights.
Independent airline consultant and former director of strategy at IAG, Robert Boyle, claimed that slots at Paris Orly previously used for domestic short-haul flights have since been reallocated to other routes. “The cancellations are very short range and will have been replaced by longer-distance flights with higher emissions,” he said in a post on the social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter.
In the case of the Spanish decision, the European Regions Airlines Association (ERA) also raised flags over the risk that suspended domestic routes could be replaced by longer, more polluting flights, in addition to the emissions due to increased road or rail travel.